linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] TTY: add support for uart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150513093536.7a1d4a13@notabene.brown>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 09:35:36 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	GTA04 owners <gta04-owner@...delico.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] TTY: add support for uart_slave devices.

On Tue, 12 May 2015 10:31:01 +0200 Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:

> Just a nit: a license mismatch.
> 
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 11:56 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/slave/uart_slave_core.c
> 
> > + *    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > + *   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > + *   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > + *   (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + *    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > + *   GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
> This states the license is GPL v2 or later.
> 
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> 
> And, according to include/linux/module.h, this states the license is
> just GPL v2. So I think either the comment at the top of this file or
> the license ident used in the MODULE_LICENSE() macro needs to change.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
> 

Thanks.  I've modified the comment to be explicit that only 'version 2' is
appropriate.

NeilBrown

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped