[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5551AA57.5060908@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:23:03 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix printk() on ERR_PTR()
Am 12.05.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Sun, 10 May 2015 21:42:15 +0200 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>
>> vbin_printf() checks whether the provided pointer is larger
>> than -PAGE_SIZE such that it does not explode on ERR_PTR() pointers.
>> printk() does not.
>>
>> Let's add this check also to the printk() code such that
>> trace_printk() and printk() are consistent again.
>>
>> ..
>>
>> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
>> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
>> @@ -511,7 +511,8 @@ char *string(char *buf, char *end, const char *s, struct printf_spec spec)
>> {
>> int len, i;
>>
>> - if ((unsigned long)s < PAGE_SIZE)
>> + if ((unsigned long)s > (unsigned long)-PAGE_SIZE ||
>
> hm, PAGE_SIZE has type ulong, so is the cast needed?
But we add a negative sign to it. AFAIK the cast is needed
to prevent gcc from promoting this to a signed long.
>> + (unsigned long)s < PAGE_SIZE)
>
> This would be a place for
>
> if (!within(PAGE_SIZE, (unsigned long)s, -PAGE_SIZE))
> s = "(null)";
>
> I'm counting at least five implementations of within(), not all the same.
Challenge accepted. :D
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists