[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdax+v48AJhoA4xJpO66ADUxOBOFLvmxKWJxLZBdN2iBgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:34:28 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...ballogic.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: max732x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent
irq controller
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Sam Protsenko
<semen.protsenko@...ballogic.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Patch applied, but it seems we need a general approach to
>> cover a few GPIO drivers with this kind of thing.
>>
>> Is this how we should always do it?
>
> I think so (well, at least it seems to be correct for GPIO expanders). But I'd
> verify each particular driver to be completely sure that it's really needed and
> it wouldn't create some new issues. MAX732X chip seems to be very similar to
> PCF857X one, so in this particular case I'm sure that this patch is a good thing
> to have.
OK yeah, maybe we could provide a list of "usual suspects", what do you
say about "my" expanders:
drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
drivers/gpio/gpio-tc3589x.c
I can surely patch and test these.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists