linux-kernel - RE: [scsi 2/2] scsi_debug: fix REPORT LUNS Well Known LU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B355C9A39@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:01 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	"dgilbert@...erlog.com" <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley\"" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
CC:	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Subject: RE: [scsi 2/2] scsi_debug: fix REPORT LUNS Well Known LU


 
> On 15-02-23 06:13 AM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > The use case to report 'REPORT LUNS WLUN' described
> > in scsi_debug documentation didn't work because:
> > scsi_scan_host_selected() checks for:
> > 	 lun < shost->max_lun
> >
> > To fix this we set:
> > 	max_lun = SCSI_W_LUN_REPORT_LUNS + 1;
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
> 
Is anyone picking up this changes ? 
What is the review process on the scsi list
Thanks
Tomas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/