[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2349651.fBUtehr528@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:14:10 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: y2038@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: Ed Cashin <ed.cashin@....org>,
Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH] aoe: Use 64-bit timestamp in frame
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:44:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> There are of course multiple ways to do this. One way would be to
> change the code to work on 32-bit nanoseconds instead of 32-bit
> microseconds. This requires proving that the we cannot exceed
> 4.29 seconds of round-trip time in calc_rttavg().
> Is that a valid assumption or not?
>
> If not, we could replace do_gettimeofday() with ktime_get_ts64().
> This will ensure we don't need a 64-bit division when converting
> the ts64 to a 32-bit microsecond value, and combined with the
> conversion is still no slower than do_gettimeofday(), and it
> still avoids the double bookkeeping because it uses a monotonic
> timebase that is robust against settimeofday.
Two other approaches that occurred to me later:
- introduce common ktime_get_ms(), ktime_get_us(), ktime_get_real_ms()
and ktime_get_real_is() interfaces, to match the other interfaces
we already provide. These could be done as efficiently or better
than what aoe does manually today.
- change the timebase that is used for the computations in aoe to use
scaled nanoseconds instead of microseconds. Using
u32 time = ktime_get_ns() >> 10;
would give you a similar range and precision as microseconds, but
completely avoid integer division. You could also use a different
shift value to either extend the range beyond 71 minutes, or the
extend the precision to something below a microsecond. This would
be the most efficient implementation, but also require significant
changes to the driver.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists