[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150512124319.GA17244@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:43:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_ISOLATION=y (was: [PATCH 0/6] support "dataplane" mode
for nohz_full)
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:34:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's what I meant: CONFIG_ISOLATION would trigger what is
> > NO_HZ_FULL today - we could possibly even remove CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > as an individual Kconfig option?
>
> Ah, as a rename of nohz_full, sure that might work.
It could also be named CONFIG_CPU_ISOLATION=y, to make it more
explicit what it's about.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists