[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150512130824.GI6776@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 06:08:24 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dataplane nohz: run softirqs synchronously on user
entry
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:32:02AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:13:16PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > The thing you want to avoid is having two processes both
> > runnable at once
>
> Right, because as soon as nr_running > 1 we kill the entire nohz_full
> thing. RT or not for ksoftirqd doesn't matter.
>
> Then again, like interrupts, you basically want to avoid softirqs in
> this mode.
>
> So I think the right solution is to figure out why the softirqs get
> raised and cure that.
Makes sense, but it also makes sense to have something that detects
when that cure fails and clean up. And, in a test/debug environment,
also issuing some sort of diagnostic in that case.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists