linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150512142759.GK10961@lukather>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 16:27:59 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>,
	Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > lkml.org is being terrible as usual so I can't see half the thread (or
> > > at least got fed up trying to get it to load)
> 
> > A part of it is also here:
> > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1405.0/00484.html
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> > > but I think the discussion there petered out more than anything
> > > else.
> 
> > Maybe it did :)
> 
> I think so looking at the archives.
> 
> > > Or was it the suggestion to make this something that the driver core
> > > supported so that we didn't have to open code it for every bus?
> 
> > Probably. That's something I really haven't took the time to look at,
> > and don't really plan on doing so.
> 
> > I guess a good way forward would be to revive this patch, and wait for
> > that generic way to happen.
> 
> > What do you think of this?
> 
> Probably best, the Pi bootloader does make it a bit more important.
> Might also be worth speaking to Greg though.

So, do you want me to resend that patch and discuss this directly
there (with Greg in Cc) ?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)