linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/23] posix-timers:Convert to the 64bit methods for the timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 17:33:59 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	y2038@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/23] posix-timers:Convert to the 64bit methods for the timer_gettime syscall function

On Tuesday 12 May 2015 22:07:53 Baolin Wang wrote:
>  }
>  
> +static void default_timer_get64(struct k_itimer *timr,
> +                              struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting64)
> +{
> +       struct itimerspec cur_setting;
> +       struct k_clock *kc = clockid_to_kclock(timr->it_clock);
> +
> +       kc->timer_get(timr, &cur_setting);
> +       *cur_setting64 = itimerspec_to_itimerspec64(&cur_setting);
> +}
> +
> 

The new version is correct, but when I asked you in private to send the update,
what I meant was a reply to my email, and only the updated function for the
sake of discussion. You have now sent the patch as a new thread, which means
we have two email conversations with the same subject line and different
contents, which is rather confusing and should be avoided.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/