linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] alpha: Wire up missing syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEdQ38GPNJB9GS5AJk+mZngOjBgVagnitD6OBwqfvrq==m7fXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 10:36:06 -0700
From:	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
To:	Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>,
	Chen Gang <xili_gchen_5257@...mail.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	"mattst88@...il.com" <mattst88@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: Wire up missing syscalls

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz> wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:33:36AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> The related warnings:
>>
>>     CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>>   <stdin>:1238:2: warning: #warning syscall seccomp not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1241:2: warning: #warning syscall getrandom not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1244:2: warning: #warning syscall memfd_create not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1247:2: warning: #warning syscall bpf not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1250:2: warning: #warning syscall execveat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>
> Chen: Have you tested the syscalls you have wired up?
>
> I have a suspicion that more is required to wire up the seccomp
> syscall.  At least some of the other older architectures had to
> implement some extra arch dependent support to implement the seccomp
> syscall.  I don't know whether this is necessary or not on Alpha so
> was wondering if this has been considered?
>
> Matt:  are you still feeding Alpha patches to Linus?  I suspect there
> might be a few other patches other than this one submitted to
> linux-alpha that should be applied.

I haven't been for a while, but I do want to get back to it. I have a
bunch of patches marked that I need to collect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/