[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1431466701-653-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:38:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com, Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: Change function declaration to bool
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int. The current declaration was introduced
in commit c0f4dfd4f90f (rcu: Make RCU_FAST_NO_HZ take advantage of numbered
callbacks). But it is actually returning bool and as the function description
states " * Return true if the specified CPU has any callback....", this probably
should be a bool as all (3) call-sites currently treat it as bool.
Type-checking coccinelle spatches are being used to locate type mismatches
between function signatures and return values in this case this produced:
./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3538 WARNING: return of wrong type
int != bool,
Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y)
Patch is against 4.1-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20150511) and fixes
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 6b2d76a8250f..fdbf30cf779f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3494,7 +3494,7 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
* non-NULL, store an indication of whether all callbacks are lazy.
* (If there are no callbacks, all of them are deemed to be lazy.)
*/
-static int __maybe_unused rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy)
+static bool __maybe_unused rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy)
{
bool al = true;
bool hc = false;
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists