linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/24] rcu: Remove prompt for RCU implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1431469854-3826-23-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 15:30:53 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/24] rcu: Remove prompt for RCU implementation

From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>

The RCU implementation is chosen based on PREEMPT and SMP config options
and is not really a user-selectable choice.  This commit removes the
menu entry, given that there is not much point in calling something a
choice when there is in fact no choice..  The TINY_RCU, TREE_RCU, and
PREEMPT_RCU Kconfig options continue to be selected based solely on the
values of the PREEMPT and SMP options.

Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 init/Kconfig | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index af2c93c4a105..4c08197044f1 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -465,13 +465,9 @@ endmenu # "CPU/Task time and stats accounting"
 
 menu "RCU Subsystem"
 
-choice
-	prompt "RCU Implementation"
-	default TREE_RCU
-
 config TREE_RCU
-	bool "Tree-based hierarchical RCU"
-	depends on !PREEMPT && SMP
+	bool
+	default y if !PREEMPT && SMP
 	help
 	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
 	  designed for very large SMP system with hundreds or
@@ -479,8 +475,8 @@ config TREE_RCU
 	  smaller systems.
 
 config PREEMPT_RCU
-	bool "Preemptible tree-based hierarchical RCU"
-	depends on PREEMPT
+	bool
+	default y if PREEMPT
 	help
 	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
 	  designed for very large SMP systems with hundreds or
@@ -491,16 +487,14 @@ config PREEMPT_RCU
 	  Select this option if you are unsure.
 
 config TINY_RCU
-	bool "UP-only small-memory-footprint RCU"
-	depends on !PREEMPT && !SMP
+	bool
+	default y if !PREEMPT && !SMP
 	help
 	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
 	  designed for UP systems from which real-time response
 	  is not required.  This option greatly reduces the
 	  memory footprint of RCU.
 
-endchoice
-
 config RCU_EXPERT
 	bool "Make expert-level adjustments to RCU configuration"
 	default n
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/