linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] A few small fixups to the alarmtimer-suspend test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLVdK9sTL9x9_6qxCnR_LhuMEAvQHjB3V+PC_pt9aWY_iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 16:16:22 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] A few small fixups to the alarmtimer-suspend test

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 04:13 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> Hey Shuah,
>>   Wanted to send along a few small fixups to the alarmtimer-suspend
>> test that I had pending.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any objections or feedback.
>>
>
> Hi John,
>
> No issues with these. We are tweaking sleep and suspend
> times. The nature of the beast I am guessing. I gave it
> test run and looks good. I would like to get these into
> rc5. Patches 1 and 3 look like critical fixes to
> me. I will wait a couple of days for any reviews comments
> before I apply them to linux-kselftest fixes.

I'd not claim any of them are actually urgent. So if you'd rather
queue these for 4.2 I'm fine with it.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/