lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513054912.GC20825@lst.de>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 07:49:12 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] target/configfs: Convert mappedlun + SCSI MIBs
	to RCU reader

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:09:23PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Why do we still need TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS? Isn't deve 
> > being not-NULL enough?
> > 
> 
> Yep, I think this can go as well.  Dropping now.

Also might be worth to add a helper that has the ->se_lun_acl check
in one place and documents why these callers want a dev_entry with
a proper ACL.  Also I think the ->se_lun checks should not be needed
here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ