lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513062458.GA21426@lst.de>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 08:24:58 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>
Cc:	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] target: Convert se_portal_group->tpg_lun_list[]
	to RCU hlist


> FIXME: Figure out how sbp-target se_lun usage should work

The Xen usage also looks really weird.  Maybe Juergen can explain what
scsiback_add_translation_entry is trying to do?  Note that I think both
sbp and xen really should be working on node ACLs.  Right now both
of them oly supported autogenerated ACLs, so in practice it doesn't
matter, but keeping the data structure use clean is a goal on it's own.

> @@ -281,8 +281,6 @@ int iscsit_tpg_del_portal_group(
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  
> -	core_tpg_clear_object_luns(&tpg->tpg_se_tpg);
> -

How does the removal of tis function including it's only caller
in the iscsi code fiit into the picture?  The only explanation I could come
up with is that it wasn't even needed before, in which case it should be
dropped in a seaprate, properly documented patch.

> +static void target_fabric_port_release(struct config_item *item)
> +{
> +	struct se_lun *lun = container_of(to_config_group(item),
> +					  struct se_lun, lun_group);
> +
> +	call_rcu(&lun->rcu_head, target_lun_callrcu);

Just use kfree_rcu here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ