linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v6 4/7] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for PM QoS device latencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp=FK1ietZdx4fkRF0j_i1me8f+w5YasFHHyBCARwAr+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 10:36:21 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v6 4/7] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for PM QoS
 device latencies

On 27 April 2015 at 14:43, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> PM QoS device start/stop are properties of the hardware.
> In legacy code, they're specified from platform code.
> On DT platforms, their values should come from DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> v6:
>   - Rebased on top of v4.1-rc1 for new RFC,
>
> v4:
>   - Drop save/restore state latencies, as they're Linux driver-specific,
>   - Change state to RFC, as this is put on hold,
>
> v3:
>   - No changes,
>
> v2:
>   - New.
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> index d659e5cb39be6057..32d1d3a399fe2a48 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> @@ -73,12 +73,18 @@ Required properties:
>   - power-domains : A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of
>                     the power controller specified by phandle.
>
> +Optional properties:
> + - stop-latency: Stop latency of the device, in ns,
> + - start-latency: Start latency of the device, in ns,
> +

What do you think of renaming these to "suspend-latency" and
"resume-latency" instead? I think that better reflects their purpose.
I have no strong opinion though.

>  Example:
>
>         leaky-device@...50000 {
>                 compatible = "foo,i-leak-current";
>                 reg = <0x12350000 0x1000>;
>                 power-domains = <&power 0>;
> +               stop-latency = <250000>;
> +               start-latency = <250000>;
>         };
>
>  The node above defines a typical PM domain consumer device, which is located
> --
> 1.9.1
>

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/