[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513084226.GO4561@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:42:26 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@...com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, bhe@...hat.com,
joro@...tes.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, ddutile@...hat.com,
ishii.hironobu@...fujitsu.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
doug.hatch@...com, jerry.hoemann@...com, tom.vaden@...com,
li.zhang6@...com, lisa.mitchell@...com, billsumnerlinux@...il.com,
rwright@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Items required for kdump
On 05/13/15 at 09:45am, Li, ZhenHua wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 04:17 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >On 05/11/15 at 05:52pm, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
> >>Add context entry functions needed for kdump.
> >>+/*
> >>+ * Fix Crashdump failure caused by leftover DMA through a hardware IOMMU
> >>+ *
> >>+ * Fixes the crashdump kernel to deal with an active iommu and legacy
> >>+ * DMA from the (old) panicked kernel in a manner similar to how legacy
> >>+ * DMA is handled when no hardware iommu was in use by the old kernel --
> >>+ * allow the legacy DMA to continue into its current buffers.
> >>+ *
> >>+ * In the crashdump kernel, this code:
> >>+ * 1. skips disabling the IOMMU's translating.
> >>+ * 2. Do not re-enable IOMMU's translating.
> >>+ * 3. In kdump kernel, use the old root entry table.
> >>+ * 4. Allocate pages for new context entry, copy data from old context entries
> >>+ * in the old kernel to the new ones.
> >>+ *
> >>+ * In other kinds of kernel, for example, a kernel started by kexec,
> >>+ * do the same thing as crashdump kernel.
> >>+ */
> >>+
> >>+
> >
> >Above comments should come along with the code changes instead of putting it
> >in this patch.
> >
> >BTW, there's one more blank line at the end..
> Code change is in 00/10, the cover letter.
I means the real code, not the changelog.
> And the blank does not matter, I checked the patch with
> scripts/checkpatch.pl, no warnings, no errors.
Why add two line breaks if one is enough? Adding such check in checkpatch.pl
make sense to me actually.
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists