[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513105556.2607d99c@thinkpad-w530>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:55:56 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
yang.shi@...driver.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, mst@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, David.Laight@...LAB.COM, hughd@...gle.com,
hocko@...e.cz, ralf@...ux-mips.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux@....linux.org.uk, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...el.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/15] arm/futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() relies
on disabled preemption
> * David Hildenbrand | 2015-05-13 09:38:12 [+0200]:
>
> >Thanks, I'll include it in the next version.
> >
> >So I assume the cleanest thing to do would be:
> >
> >#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6
> > preempt_disable();
> >#endif
>
> Correct. But also for futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() which also behind
> CONFIG_SMP curtain. That is why I suggested a new patch :)
>
> >David
>
> Sebastian
Ah, okay I think now I got it :)
So both patches are fine for now, but we should replace CONFIG_SMP
by __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >=6 in both file, not only in the code I touch (to make
it map arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h style).
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists