[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55531E9E.2030805@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 18:51:26 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] ARM: dts: exynos4: Use labels for overriding
nodesin Exynos4210
W dniu 13.05.2015 o 18:02, Kukjin Kim pisze:
> On 05/11/15 22:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Usage of labels instead of full paths reduces possible mistakes when
>> overriding nodes.
>>
> Well, I'm not sure what kind of the possible mistakes you mentioned...?
One can make a mistake in path when overriding. For example we have:
exynos4.dtsi:
/ {
gic: interrupt-controller@...90000 {
...
};
}
and someone can add in child dtsi (like exynos4210.dtsi):
/ {
soc {
interrupt-controller@...90000 {
cpu-offset = <0x8000>;
}
}
}
or he can make a mistake in address.
As a result the gic node won't be properly overridden.
>
> I don't think we need to use the label for gic, combiner.
They are overridden by child DTSI. First definition is in exynos4.dtsi
and exynos4210.dtsi adds a cpu-offset.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists