[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513005929.GE14292@cloud>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:29 -0700
From: josh@...htriplett.org
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test both RCU-sched and
RCU-bh for Tiny RCU
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Reported-by: "Ahmed, Iftekhar" <ahmedi@...d.oregonstate.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Could you elaborate a bit more on this patch (ideally in its commit
message)? I see an addition of a command-line parameter to test rcu_bh;
is rcu-sched already tested elsewhere by some other config, or does this
parameter somehow enable testing both?
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot
> index 0f0802730014..6c1a292a65fb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1
> rcupdate.rcu_self_test_bh=1
> +rcutorture.torture_type=rcu_bh
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists