[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513103157.GF1517@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:31:57 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] mce: Stop using array-index-based RCU
primitives
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:18:41PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Because mce is arch-specific x86 code, there is little or no
> performance benefit of using rcu_dereference_index_check() over using
> smp_load_acquire(). It also turns out that mce is the only place that
> array-index-based RCU is used, and it would be convenient to drop
> this portion of the RCU API.
>
> This patch therefore changes rcu_dereference_index_check() uses to
> smp_load_acquire(), but keeping the lockdep diagnostics, and also
> changes rcu_access_index() uses to READ_ONCE().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Looks good to me.
If it is easier for you carrying it in your tree:
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Otherwise, let me know.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists