[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513090344.7dafde1f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:03:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test both RCU-sched and
RCU-bh for Tiny RCU
On Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:29 -0700
josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Reported-by: "Ahmed, Iftekhar" <ahmedi@...d.oregonstate.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Could you elaborate a bit more on this patch (ideally in its commit
> message)? I see an addition of a command-line parameter to test rcu_bh;
> is rcu-sched already tested elsewhere by some other config, or does this
> parameter somehow enable testing both?
>
Agreed. Subject only commits should only be for typo fixes in comments.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists