linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test both RCU-sched and RCU-bh for Tiny RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 09:03:44 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test both RCU-sched and
 RCU-bh for Tiny RCU

On Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:29 -0700
josh@...htriplett.org wrote:

> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Reported-by: "Ahmed, Iftekhar" <ahmedi@...d.oregonstate.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Could you elaborate a bit more on this patch (ideally in its commit
> message)?  I see an addition of a command-line parameter to test rcu_bh;
> is rcu-sched already tested elsewhere by some other config, or does this
> parameter somehow enable testing both?
> 

Agreed. Subject only commits should only be for typo fixes in comments.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/