[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55534CA2.7030105@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:07:46 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, numa: Really disable NUMA balancing by default on
single node machines
On 05/13/2015 04:10 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
> the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of num_online_nodes
> (online nodes). The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1
> or higher will enable NUMA balancing. This will incur useless overhead due
> to minor faults with the impact depending on the workload. These are the
> impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
> whose node ID happened to be 1;
>
> vanilla patched
> NUMA base PTE updates 5113158 0
> NUMA huge PMD updates 643 0
> NUMA page range updates 5442374 0
> NUMA hint faults 2109622 0
> NUMA hint local faults 2109622 0
> NUMA hint local percent 100 100
> NUMA pages migrated 0 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> #v3.8+
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists