[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49h9rg62ta.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:10:25 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <axboe@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: don't account discard request size
Shaohua Li <shli@...com> writes:
> In a workload with discard request, the IO throughput is generally much
> higher than expected. This is quite confusing checking iostat. Discard
> request doesn't really write data to drive, so don't account it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index fd154b9..0128d18 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -2138,7 +2138,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_rq_err_bytes);
>
> void blk_account_io_completion(struct request *req, unsigned int bytes)
> {
> - if (blk_do_io_stat(req)) {
> + /*
> + * discard request doesn't really write @bytes to drive,
> + * doesn't account it
> + **/
> + if (blk_do_io_stat(req) && !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD)) {
> const int rw = rq_data_dir(req);
> struct hd_struct *part;
> int cpu;
I think you want to modify __get_request to not set REQ_IO_STAT for
discard requests. This patch will still account the start of I/O, which
means in_flight will be off.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists