linux-kernel - [PATCH] ARM: module: Add ".ref.text" to arm unwind tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1431530457-19909-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 20:50:57 +0530
From:	Vignesh Radhakrishnan <vigneshr@...eaurora.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Vignesh Radhakrishnan <vigneshr@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: module: Add ".ref.text" to arm unwind tables

Functions inside kernel modules that use __ref
will end up being placed in .ARM.exidx.ref.text
section by gcc.

Currently we don't consider adding these functions
to arm unwind tables.

Hence, if we turn slub debug on by default we end up
with the messages of this sort:

	unwind: Index not found bf0011e0

This is because slub debug saves stack trace of
allocation's and free's. Therefore, we end up seeing
a flood of these messages in dmesg since its not
able to locate these functions.

Fix this by adding .ref.text section to arm unwind tables.

Signed-off-by: Vignesh Radhakrishnan <vigneshr@...eaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/module.h | 1 +
 arch/arm/kernel/module.c      | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/module.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/module.h
index ed690c4..17640c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/module.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/module.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ enum {
 	ARM_SEC_DEVEXIT,
 	ARM_SEC_HOT,
 	ARM_SEC_UNLIKELY,
+	ARM_SEC_REF,
 	ARM_SEC_MAX,
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
index 2e11961..846b888 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
@@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf32_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
 			maps[ARM_SEC_UNLIKELY].unw_sec = s;
 		else if (strcmp(".ARM.exidx.text.hot", secname) == 0)
 			maps[ARM_SEC_HOT].unw_sec = s;
+		else if (strcmp(".ARM.exidx.ref.text", secname) == 0)
+			maps[ARM_SEC_REF].unw_sec = s;
 		else if (strcmp(".init.text", secname) == 0)
 			maps[ARM_SEC_INIT].txt_sec = s;
 		else if (strcmp(".text", secname) == 0)
@@ -318,6 +320,8 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf32_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
 			maps[ARM_SEC_UNLIKELY].txt_sec = s;
 		else if (strcmp(".text.hot", secname) == 0)
 			maps[ARM_SEC_HOT].txt_sec = s;
+		else if (strcmp(".ref.text", secname) == 0)
+			maps[ARM_SEC_REF].txt_sec = s;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARM_SEC_MAX; i++)
-- 
1.8.2.1

-- 
Thanks and regards,
Vignesh Radhakrishnan

QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/