[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555381B8.5020504@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:54:16 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: base: upgrade initcall level of of_init from core
to pure
On 13/05/15 17:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>> On 13/05/15 14:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>>> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> Yes I read and was bit hesitant initially to do this change, but found
>>>> no better way. I posted mainly to discuss other possibilities to solve
>>>> the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps of_init should not be an initcall at all and it should go into
>>> driver_init().
>>
>>
>> That seems ideal place to me as most of kset and kobjects are created
>> there. Something like below patch ? However found that PPC had a
>> function with same name which can conflict and we need to rename one of
>> these two.
>
> It looks like the PPC one is in the boot wrapper. They shouldn't
> collide. If they do, then how about of_core_init.
>
Thanks for the review, will check the PPC build and change accordingly
if required.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists