[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xm26sib04cgb.fsf@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:25:08 -0700
From: bsegall@...gle.com
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pjt@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, klamm@...dex-team.ru,
mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] hrtimer: Allow concurrent hrtimer_start() for self restarting timers
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> @@ -4038,7 +4041,7 @@ void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(default_cfs_period());
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq);
> - hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->period_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->period_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> cfs_b->period_timer.function = sched_cfs_period_timer;
> hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->slack_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> cfs_b->slack_timer.function = sched_cfs_slack_timer;
> @@ -4052,7 +4055,13 @@ static void init_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>
> void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> {
> - start_bandwidth_timer(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&cfs_b->lock);
> +
> + if (!cfs_b->period_active) {
> + cfs_b->period_active = 1;
> + hrtimer_forward_now(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> + hrtimer_start_expires(&cfs_b->period_timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> + }
> }
>
I don't think the cfsb period timer actually needs to be pinned, even
though it has generally run as such due to start_bandwidth_timer.
The period_active code looks fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists