linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] drivers/cpufreq: Convert non-modular drivers to use builtin_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 23:17:30 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] drivers/cpufreq: Convert non-modular drivers to use builtin_driver_register

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 10-05-15, 15:49, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> These files depend on Kconfig options all of which are a bool, so
>> we use the appropriate registration function, which avoids us
>> relying on an implicit inclusion of <module.h> which we are
>> doing currently.
>>
>> While this currently works, we really don't want to be including
>> the module.h header in non-modular code, which we'd be forced
>> to do, pending some upcoming code relocation from init.h into
>> module.h.  So we fix it now by using the non-modular equivalent.
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
>
> Exynos can be compiled as a module:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm:
>
> config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
>         tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS CPUfreq Driver"
>         depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412 || SOC_EXYNOS5250

Sounds like things have changed since I did the original compile
testing ; thanks for the heads-up and I will follow up with the details,
once I can re-test.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

>
> --
> viresh
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/