linux-kernel - Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 13:38:24 -0700
From:	Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>
Cc:	David Lang <david@...g.hm>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Howard Chu <hyc@...as.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, <tux3@...3.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)

On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
>> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ...
>
> Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and 
> inclusion into 
> the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has way 
> better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves than 
> accusing them of bad faith.
>
> Its yours to choose. 
>
> What outcome do you want to create?

The outcome I would like is:

  * Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past,
    not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and
    collegial conduct.

  * Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and
    testers and move it along faster.

  * I left LKML better than I found it.

  * Group hugs

Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational.

Regards,

Daniel
    

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/