[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150514080634.GA14231@sejong>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 17:06:34 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix some option handling on --stdio
Hi Arnaldo,
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:07:19PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:03:26AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > There's a bug that perf report sometimes ignore some options on --stdio
> > output. This bug is triggered only if a related config variable is
> > set. For example, let's assume we have a following config file.
>
> Testing, please next time indicate against what branch this is to be
> applied, as I thought about perf/core, but it doesn't apply there, so
> tried perf/urgent, where it applies.
Oh, sorry about that. I actually intended to apply it to the
perf/core but forgot to rebase to the current code. It's fortunate
that it can be applied to perf/urgent cleanly though. :)
I'll add an indication next time if patch should go to other branch
than perf/core.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists