lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150514001648.GA5206@kernel>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2015 08:16:49 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>, gleb@...nel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: MMU: fix MTRR update

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:10:08PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>On 13/05/2015 10:43, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> kvm_mmu_reset_context
>>   kvm_mmu_unload
>>     mmu_free_roots
>> 
>> The original root shadow page will be freed in mmu_free_roots, where I
>> miss?
>> 
>> Another question maybe not related to this patch:
>> 
>> If kvm_mmu_reset_context is just called to destroy the original root 
>> shadow page and all the sptes will remain valid? 
>
>SPTEs are kept around and cached.  The "role" field is used as the hash
>key; if the role doesn't change, SPTEs are reused, so you have to zap
>the SPTEs explicitly.

Thanks for your explanation. :)

Btw, why the patch changelog mentioned that the root shadow page will be
reused, I think it will be zapped in mmu_free_roots. 

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>
>Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ