[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555483F6.3080607@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:16:06 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] enhance shmem process and swap accounting
On 03/27/2015 05:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> o In Patch 2, rely on SHMEM_I(inode)->swapped if possible, and fallback to
> radix tree iterator on partially mapped shmem objects, i.e. decouple shmem
> swap usage determination from the page walk, for performance reasons.
> Thanks to Jerome and Konstantin for the tips.
> The downside is that mm/shmem.c had to be touched.
>
Ping? I've got only a minor suggestion from Konstantin and no more
feedback. Hugh?
Thanks,
Vlastimil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists