[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555483C8.9060603@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:15:20 +0800
From: "long.wanglong" <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: 王龙 <wanglong@...qinren.net>,
jkosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, paulmck <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
pmladek <pmladek@...e.cz>, dzickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
johannes <johannes@...solutions.net>, koct9i <koct9i@...il.com>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo <mingo@...hat.com>,
hpa <hpa@...or.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
atomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"sasha.levin" <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
peifeiyue <peifeiyue@...wei.com>,
"morgan.wang" <morgan.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] how to perform a safe NMI stack trace on all CPUs on x86?
On 2015/5/13 22:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:14:54 +0800
> "王龙" <wanglong@...qinren.net> wrote:
>
>
>> context. But how do we fix this problem in older version of kernel(eg, 3.10 stable)?
>> The 3.10 stable has no "switch printk routine" and "seq_buf" infrastructures.
>>
>> Could anyone give me some ideas?
>>
>
> Backport the necessary patches.
>
> -- Steve
>
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your reply, I will backport necessary patches to 3.10 stable.
Welcome you to review my backport patches.
Best Regards
Wang Long
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists