linux-kernel - btrfs balance 4.0 regression?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+5PVA5HhK07LHXcPxDV=JztgdRRa+2LsK7RJXDZ-Y+esAqX1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2015 08:43:25 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	osandov@...ndov.com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: btrfs balance 4.0 regression?

Hi Omar and Chris,

We have a bug reported [1] against 4.0 saying that btrfs balance is
broken.  The reporter found a revert patch that Omar sent [2] to
revert commit 2f0810880.  Looking in Linus' latest tree, I don't see
that revert and I don't immediately see a patch to fix the issue Omar
reported either.

Do either of you know if this is still an issue?  If not, which commit
was it fixed by?

josh

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217191
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6238111/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/