[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150514095504.3076310c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 09:55:04 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Cc: <jkosina@...e.cz>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, <wanglong@...qinren.net>,
<peifeiyue@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<morgan.wang@...wei.com>, <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<pmladek@...e.cz>, <dzickus@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17][request for stable 3.10 inclusion] x86/nmi:
Print all cpu stacks from NMI safely
On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:34:47 +0000
Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com> wrote:
> The patch 1-13 backport the "seq_buf" infrastructures. in detail, patch 1, 2
> and 6 only backport "seq_buf" related code.
>
Ah, so basically you just backported the seq_buf.c code without
modifying the trace_seq code. That's a good approach. I don't have much
time to look at these but I'll try to skim them to see if I find
anything broken.
I may pull all of them into a test branch and run my tests to make sure
they don't break anything else.
-- Steve
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 86 +++++++++-
> include/linux/percpu.h | 4 +
> include/linux/printk.h | 2 +
> include/linux/seq_buf.h | 136 ++++++++++++++++
> kernel/printk.c | 41 +++--
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/seq_buf.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 617 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/seq_buf.h
> create mode 100644 lib/seq_buf.c
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists