[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5554EF4D.9030803@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:54:05 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] ipv6: do not delete previously existing ECMP
routes if add fails
Le 13/05/2015 21:59, Michal Kubecek a écrit :
> If adding a nexthop of an IPv6 multipath route fails, comment in
> ip6_route_multipath() says we are going to delete all nexthops already
> added. However, current implementation deletes even the routes it
> hasn't even tried to add yet. For example, running
>
> ip route add 1234:5678::/64 \
> nexthop via fe80::aa dev dummy1 \
> nexthop via fe80::bb dev dummy1 \
> nexthop via fe80::cc dev dummy1
>
> twice results in removing all routes first command added.
>
> Limit the second (delete) run to nexthops that succeeded in the first
> (add) run.
>
> Fixes: 51ebd3181572 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath (ECMP)")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists