[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5554F1C4.5060802@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 21:04:36 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Align jump targets to 1 byte boundaries
On 05/14/2015 08:17 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> There were also these other changes I tested:
>
> + # Reduces vmlinux size by 0.25%:
> + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-caller-saves
> +
> + # Reduces vmlinux size by 1.10%:
> + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-inline-small-functions
> +
> + # Reduces vmlinux size by about 0.95%:
> + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-tree-ch
>
> We could maybe consider -fno-caller-saves. What do you think about
> that option?
Quick googling din't even find what it does.
It would need a comment :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists