lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK5ve-Jjwx8Q9-9eskPo+zZDRYiyDF_xam6zraYzWHmn4Jfj1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2015 13:50:16 -0700
From:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
To:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: remove redundant SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC flag

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
<j.anaszewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> I personally can't find any strong argument against this optimization.
> I added both flags on Bryan's request while implementing LED Flash class
> extension. I can see a few occurrences in the include/linux directory
> where both SYNC and ASYNC flags are implemented. The argument in favour
> could be the fact that the flags influence the core functionality of
> the subsystem.
>
> Bryan, could you express your opinion, please?
>

Please keep this flag and although it's redundant at this point I
think it's still make code more clear and easy to understand.

Thanks,
-Bryan

>
> On 05/13/2015 05:41 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>
>>
>> There is a complimentary flag called SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC.
>> Having both is redundant. This patch removes the unneeded flag
>> without any functionality change.
>>
>> CC: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
>> CC: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
>> CC: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
>> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> ---
>>   drivers/leds/led-class-flash.c |    1 -
>>   drivers/leds/led-core.c        |    4 +---
>>   include/linux/leds.h           |    2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class-flash.c
>> b/drivers/leds/led-class-flash.c
>> index 3b25734..bb67364 100644
>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-class-flash.c
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-class-flash.c
>> @@ -318,7 +318,6 @@ int led_classdev_flash_register(struct device *parent,
>>
>>         /* Setting a torch brightness needs to have immediate effect */
>>         led_cdev->flags &= ~SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC;
>> -       led_cdev->flags |= SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC;
>>
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>> index 9886dac..356e851 100644
>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>> @@ -129,10 +129,8 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev
>> *led_cdev,
>>         if (led_cdev->flags & SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC) {
>>                 led_set_brightness_async(led_cdev, brightness);
>>                 return;
>> -       } else if (led_cdev->flags & SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC)
>> +       } else
>>                 ret = led_set_brightness_sync(led_cdev, brightness);
>> -       else
>> -               ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>>         if (ret < 0)
>>                 dev_dbg(led_cdev->dev, "Setting LED brightness failed
>> (%d)\n",
>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>> index 9a2b000..c9e6e5d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct led_classdev {
>>   #define LED_BLINK_INVERT      (1 << 19)
>>   #define LED_SYSFS_DISABLE     (1 << 20)
>>   #define SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC  (1 << 21)
>> -#define SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC    (1 << 22)
>> +/* bit 22 unused, take it */
>>   #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH     (1 << 23)
>>
>>         /* Set LED brightness level */
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ