| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55541F92.4020404@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:07:46 +0900
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
CC: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210platform
On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi Bart,
> On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support
>> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
>> for this platform.
>
> Gentle Ping. Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant
> patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos
> mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)?
Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this
approach when Thomas posted.
> Also what is your
> preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would
> be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of
> git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)?
>
I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I
think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the
smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or
Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic
branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way.
Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that?
> I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are
> no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)...
>
Sure, why not :-)
Thanks,
Kukjin
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
>> It consists of a modified "[PATCH v12 0/6] cpufreq: use generic
>> cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms" [1] patch series from Thomas
>> Abraham. As there have not been updates of this patchset since
>> November 2014 I decided to dust it off myself. I updated Thomas'
>> patchset to current kernels, fixed bugs that I noticed and removed
>> non-Exynos4210 support for now (to speed up inclusion in upstream
>> kernel). Since some modifications were not trivial I dropped all
>> Reviewed-by:, Tested-by: and Acked-by: tags. Please review/test
>> this patchset and reply with revelant tag (Thank You!). I also
>> plan to work on Exynos4x12 support next (which was missing in
>> the original patchset) and then on Exynos5250/Exynos5420 one.
>>
>> This patch series has been tested on Exynos4210 based Origen and
>> Trats boards.
>>
>> Depends on:
>> - next-20150330 branch of linux-next kernel tree
>> (mfd tree contains a crucial fix for MAX8997 PMIC support)
>> - "[PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos4: Disable ARMCLK down feature on
>> Exynos4210 SoC" [2]
>>
>> [1] https://www.marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=141657611003803&w=2
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/27/568
>>
>> Changes over Thomas' code:
>> - fixed issue with wrong dividers being setup by Common Clock Framework
>> (by an addition of CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES clock flag to mout_apll clock,
>> without this change cpufreq-dt driver showed ~10 mA larger energy
>> consumption when compared to cpufreq-exynos one when "performance"
>> cpufreq governor was used on Exynos4210 SoC based Origen board), this
>> was probably meant to be workarounded by use of CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE
>> and CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY clock flags in the original patchset (in
>> "[PATCH v12 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update
>> clock flags") but using these flags is not sufficient to fix the issue
>> observed
>> - fixed issue with setting lower dividers before the parent clock speed
>> was lowered (the issue resulted in lockup on Exynos4210 SoC based
>> Origen board when "ondemand" cpufreq governor was stress tested)
>> - fixed missing spin_unlock on error in exynos_cpuclk_post_rate_change()
>> problem by moving cfg_data search outside of the spin locked area
>> - removed leftover kfree() in exynos_register_cpu_clock() that could
>> result in dereferencing the NULL pointer on error
>> - moved spin_lock earlier in exynos_cpuclk_pre_rate_change() to cover
>> reading of E4210_SRC_CPU and E4210_DIV_CPU1 registers
>> - added missing "last chance" checks to wait_until_divider_stable() and
>> wait_until_mux_stable() (needed in case that IRQ handling took long
>> time to proceed and resulted in function printing incorrect error
>> message about timeout)
>> - moved E4210_CPU_DIV[0,1]() macros just before their only users,
>> this resulted in moving them from patch #2 to patch #3/6 ("clk:
>> samsung: exynos4: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate
>> cpu clock")
>> - added my Copyrights to drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
>> - updated exynos-cpufreq.[c,h]
>> - removed non-Exynos4210 support for now
>> - dropped "[PATCH v12 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and
>> update clock flags" altogether for now
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>> Samsung Electronics
>>
>>
>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (1):
>> clk: add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES clock flag for Exynos cpu clock support
>>
>> Thomas Abraham (5):
>> clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
>> clk: samsung: exynos4: add cpu clock configuration data and
>> instantiate cpu clock
>> ARM: dts: Exynos4210: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property
>> ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210
>> cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4210 specific cpufreq driver support
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts | 4 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts | 4 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 4 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 12 +
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 21 +-
>> drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 +
>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 349 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h | 73 +++++
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 24 +-
>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 -
>> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 -
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 5 +-
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h | 9 -
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c | 184 ------------
>> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
>> 16 files changed, 495 insertions(+), 212 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h
>> delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists