linux-kernel - [ 06/48] x86/tls: Disallow unusual TLS segments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150515080530.559414256@1wt.eu>
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 10:05:36 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [ 06/48] x86/tls: Disallow unusual TLS segments

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>

commit 0e58af4e1d2166e9e33375a0f121e4867010d4f8 upstream.

Users have no business installing custom code segments into the
GDT, and segments that are not present but are otherwise valid
are a historical source of interesting attacks.

For completeness, block attempts to set the L bit.  (Prior to
this patch, the L bit would have been silently dropped.)

This is an ABI break.  I've checked glibc, musl, and Wine, and
none of them look like they'll have any trouble.

Note to stable maintainers: this is a hardening patch that fixes
no known bugs.  Given the possibility of ABI issues, this
probably shouldn't be backported quickly.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: security@...nel.org <security@...nel.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
(cherry picked from commit fbc3c534ddffeebba6f943945ac71ec83cfa04b8)

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tls.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tls.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tls.c
index 8dda590..6146cc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tls.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tls.c
@@ -61,6 +61,28 @@ static bool tls_desc_okay(const struct user_desc *info)
 	if (!info->seg_32bit)
 		return false;

+	/* Only allow data segments in the TLS array. */
+	if (info->contents > 1)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Non-present segments with DPL 3 present an interesting attack
+	 * surface.  The kernel should handle such segments correctly,
+	 * but TLS is very difficult to protect in a sandbox, so prevent
+	 * such segments from being created.
+	 *
+	 * If userspace needs to remove a TLS entry, it can still delete
+	 * it outright.
+	 */
+	if (info->seg_not_present)
+		return false;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	/* The L bit makes no sense for data. */
+	if (info->lm)
+		return false;
+#endif
+
 	return true;
 }

-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/