linux-kernel - Re: btrfs balance 4.0 regression?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJCQCtRgT9-zm8ywOP4GkLykY8tznpsL+1upDZmiDVneYgtQNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2015 19:09:34 -0600
From:	Chris Murphy <lists@...orremedies.com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs balance 4.0 regression?

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yup, Chris says he has a proper fix but it hasn't hit the list yet.
>
>
> Actually, ext4 convert is broken anyways (with irrelevant output
> elided):


I'm curious how this bug ended up in mainline. Isn't there an XFS test
for both balance+convert and ext4 convert? If not, shouldn't there be?
It's not a data loss bug but Btrfs is in a transitional stretch where
functionality loss bugs are no longer minor. (I'd look but I'm lazy
and xfs tests doesn't appear to be indexed.)


-- 
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/