[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55554ED1.8070304@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 21:41:37 -0400
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block:Add proper error handling to the function, disk_add_events
On 05/14/2015 09:39 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>
>
> On May 14, 2015 9:22:22 PM EDT, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2015 07:57 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> This adds the proper required error checking to the function,
>>> disk_add_events for when there are no disk events by returning
>>> the error code, -EBUSY. Further this also adds error checking
>>> for when our call to the function, sysfs_create_files by making
>>> this function's return now go into a newly declared variable,
>>> ret and at the end of this function's body return it to indicate
>>> whether this function is successful or not to the caller.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> block/genhd.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
>>> index 0a536dc..3eb7ee9 100644
>>> --- a/block/genhd.c
>>> +++ b/block/genhd.c
>>> @@ -1803,15 +1803,19 @@ static void disk_alloc_events(struct gendisk
>> *disk)
>>> disk->ev = ev;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void disk_add_events(struct gendisk *disk)
>>> +static int disk_add_events(struct gendisk *disk)
>>> {
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> if (!disk->ev)
>>> - return;
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> +
>>> + ret = sysfs_create_files(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj,
>> disk_events_attrs)
>>>
>>> - /* FIXME: error handling */
>>> - if (sysfs_create_files(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, disk_events_attrs)
>> < 0)
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> pr_warn("%s: failed to create sysfs files for events\n",
>>> disk->disk_name);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>
>> You didn't even test this, obviously.
> It builds on my system. I can't see anything wrong with it, please explain.
The fact that it compiles does not constitute that it has been tested.
And it's definitely broken, as a test boot would have revealed.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists