[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1505151019470.1295-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] suspend: delete sys_sync()
On Fri, 15 May 2015, NeilBrown wrote:
> Some storage devices don't handle suspend as well as they should and lose
> requests resulting in corruption. They should obviously be fixed, but it is
> you who gets the problem reports and you are not in a position to fix them.
> So you want a general solution that hides those problems.
> sys_sync at suspend time is a sort-of solution because it flushes and waits
> so there is less in-flight IO immediately after a sys_sync and so less
> opportunity for a bad device to stuff up.
> But you seem to suggest that sys_sync isn't a complete solution and it
> doesn't guarantee that xfs is not doing some background metadata IO.
>
> Maybe a sensible thing to do would be to hook the "disk" devices into suspend
> and have them flush their queue and possibly send a CACHE_FLUSH command.
> That would provide more of a guarantee for you, and less of a cost for Len,
> would it not?
The sd driver already does this.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists