[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150515142403.GL2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:24:03 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: NFS client broken in 4.1.0-rc2
While trying to update a kernel and modules on one of my test systems,
I was greeted by these errors:
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drx39xyj/drx39xyj.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/usb/serial/option.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/brcmfmac.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/fs/udf/udf.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-wm8962.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.ko: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/modules.alias.bin: Cannot utime
tar: lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/modules.alias: Cannot utime
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
Searching google wasn't helpful, as all the "Cannot utime" errors that
google could find are followed by an errno string.
stracing at first sight didn't seem to be helpful, as no syscalls (apart
from openat() with a pre-existing file) were failing.
Having recently updated to fc21 tar generating the archive, I thought
maybe it was a tar format bug between fc21 tar and the target's tar.
That was until I tried to "apt-get source tar" on the target, and was
greeted by the same error.
So I then tried untaring the tar source archive onto a ramfs, which
worked without complaint. The difference being that it's a root NFS
box, and so I was untaring onto NFS.
Here's the entry from /proc/mounts:
x.y.z.221:/var/boot/ci on / type nfs (rw,nolock,vers=4,addr=x.y.z.221,clientaddr=a.b.c.55)
Looking closer at the strace reveals this:
openat(AT_FDCWD, "lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC, 0600) = -1 EEXIST (File exists)
unlinkat(AT_FDCWD, "lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko", 0) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC, 0600) = 4
write(4, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0(\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
...
write(4, "\300H\0\0\34\345\1\0\314H\0\0\34\345\1\0\330H\0\0\34\345\1\0<I\0\0\34\370\1\0"..., 7312) = 7312
dup2(4, 4) = 4
fstat64(4, {st_mode=0757221, st_size=13181880119170311768, ...}) = 21
write(2, "tar: ", 5) = 5
write(2, "lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/dr"..., 79) = 79
write(2, "\n", 1) = 1
fchown32(4, 0, 0) = 0
fchmod(4, 0664) = 0
close(4) = 0
Look closely at that fstat64, and you'll notice that it's returning crap.
The file is not 11 exabytes, and it definitely would not have an octal
mode of 0757221 at this point, having only just been created by the
kernel.
For comparison, untaring onto a ramfs filesystem gives this:
openat(AT_FDCWD, "lib/modules/4.1.0-rc2+/kernel/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC, 0600) = 4
write(4, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0(\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
...
write(4, "\300H\0\0\34\345\1\0\314H\0\0\34\345\1\0\330H\0\0\34\345\1\0<I\0\0\34\370\1\0"..., 7312) = 7312
dup2(4, 4) = 4
fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=83088, ...}) = 0
utimensat(4, NULL, {{1431698625, 21832730}, {1431694673, 0}}, 0) = 0
fchown32(4, 0, 0) = 0
fchmod(4, 0664) = 0
close(4) = 0
The reason for the strange dup2() above is this code in tar:
/* Require that at least one of FD or FILE are valid. Works around
a Linux bug where futimens (AT_FDCWD, NULL) changes "." rather
than failing. */
if (!file)
{
if (fd < 0)
{
errno = EBADF;
return -1;
}
if (dup2 (fd, fd) != fd)
return -1;
}
The call path in tar is:
fdutimensat (fd, dir, file, ts, atflag)
`-futimens (fd, ts)
`-fdutimens (fd, NULL, ts);
I'm assuming that the reason for this fstat() call is:
# if __linux__
/* As recently as Linux kernel 2.6.32 (Dec 2009), several file
systems (xfs, ntfs-3g) have bugs with a single UTIME_OMIT,
but work if both times are either explicitly specified or
UTIME_NOW. Work around it with a preparatory [f]stat prior
to calling futimens/utimensat; fortunately, there is not much
timing impact due to the extra syscall even on file systems
where UTIME_OMIT would have worked. FIXME: Simplify this in
2012, when file system bugs are no longer common. */
if (adjustment_needed == 2)
{
if (fd < 0 ? stat (file, &st) : fstat (fd, &st))
return -1;
if (ts[0].tv_nsec == UTIME_OMIT)
ts[0] = get_stat_atime (&st);
else if (ts[1].tv_nsec == UTIME_OMIT)
ts[1] = get_stat_mtime (&st);
/* Note that st is good, in case utimensat gives ENOSYS. */
adjustment_needed++;
}
# endif /* __linux__ */
# if HAVE_UTIMENSAT
if (fd < 0)
{
result = utimensat (AT_FDCWD, file, ts, 0);
# ifdef __linux__
/* Work around a kernel bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/442352
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/449910
It appears that utimensat can mistakenly return 280 rather
than -1 upon ENOSYS failure.
FIXME: remove in 2010 or whenever the offending kernels
are no longer in common use. */
if (0 < result)
errno = ENOSYS;
# endif /* __linux__ */
if (result == 0 || errno != ENOSYS)
{
utimensat_works_really = 1;
return result;
}
}
# endif /* HAVE_UTIMENSAT */
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists