lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 15:02:07 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	"'Jason A. Donenfeld'" <Jason@...c4.com>,
	"shigekatsu.tateno@...el.com" <shigekatsu.tateno@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] ozwpan: Use proper check to prevent heap overflow

From: Jason A. Donenfeld
> Sent: 13 May 2015 19:34
> Since elt->length is a u8, we can make this variable a u8. Then we can
> do proper bounds checking more easily. Without this, a potentially
> negative value is passed to the memcpy inside oz_hcd_get_desc_cnf,
> resulting in a remotely exploitable heap overflow with network
> supplied data.
...
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c
> index d434d8c..cd6c63e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c
> @@ -390,8 +390,10 @@ void oz_usb_rx(struct oz_pd *pd, struct oz_elt *elt)
>  	case OZ_GET_DESC_RSP: {
>  			struct oz_get_desc_rsp *body =
>  				(struct oz_get_desc_rsp *)usb_hdr;
> -			int data_len = elt->length -
> +			u8 data_len = elt->length -
>  					sizeof(struct oz_get_desc_rsp) + 1;
> +			if (data_len > elt->length)
> +				break;

Why not just check the length. eg:
			unsigned int data_len = elt->length;
			if (data_len < sizeof(struct oz_get_desc_rsp) + 1)
				break;

>  			u16 offs = le16_to_cpu(get_unaligned(&body->offset));
>  			u16 total_size =
>  				le16_to_cpu(get_unaligned(&body->total_size));

Don't put variable definitions after code.

You don't really want to do arithmetic on local variables that are
smaller than a machine word (eg u8 and u16), doing so can require
the compiler generate a lot more code.

	David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ