lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1431704514-4204-1-git-send-email-shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 21:11:54 +0530
From:	Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] arm: perf: Fix memory leak when probing PMU PPIs

Commit 338d9dd3e2ae ("ARM: 8351/1: perf: don't warn about missing
interrupt-affinity property for PPIs") added a check for PPIs so that
we avoid parsing the interrupt-affinity property for these naturally
affine interrupts.

Unfortunately, this check can trigger an early (successful) return and
we will leak the irqs array. This patch fixes the issue by reordering
the code so that the check is performed before any independent
allocation.

Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
index 213919b..a7099ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
@@ -303,17 +303,17 @@ static int probe_current_pmu(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
 
 static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	int i, irq;
-	int *irqs = kcalloc(pdev->num_resources, sizeof(*irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	if (!irqs)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	int i, irq, *irqs;
 
 	/* Don't bother with PPIs; they're already affine */
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
 	if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq))
 		return 0;
 
+	irqs = kcalloc(pdev->num_resources, sizeof(*irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!irqs)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; ++i) {
 		struct device_node *dn;
 		int cpu;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ