linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 18:09:03 +0100
From:	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
To:	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>,
	"drjones@...hat.com" <drjones@...hat.com>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	"zhichao.huang@...aro.org" <zhichao.huang@...aro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	"jan.kiszka@...mens.com" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"r65777@...escale.com" <r65777@...escale.com>,
	"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support

On 15 May 2015 at 17:16, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org> wrote:
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> writes:
>> This gets more fun when you consider the context-aware breakpoints are
>> the highest numbered. So the set of (context-aware) breakpoints might
>> not intersect across all CPUs.
>
> I didn't see a reference to that in the ARM ARM. It seemed to imply any
> breakpoint could be context aware is .BT was appropriately set and
> linked to the VR.

No; see D2.9.2; there must be at least one context-aware
breakpoint, but no requirement for more than that.

-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/