linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.0 50/60] pinctrl: Dont just pretend to protect pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150515231020.382389947@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 16:14:51 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.0 50/60] pinctrl: Dont just pretend to protect pinctrl_maps, do it for real

4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

commit c5272a28566b00cce79127ad382406e0a8650690 upstream.

Way back, when the world was a simpler place and there was no war, no
evil, and no kernel bugs, there was just a single pinctrl lock.  That
was how the world was when (57291ce pinctrl: core device tree mapping
table parsing support) was written.  In that case, there were
instances where the pinctrl mutex was already held when
pinctrl_register_map() was called, hence a "locked" parameter was
passed to the function to indicate that the mutex was already locked
(so we shouldn't lock it again).

A few years ago in (42fed7b pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to
pinctrl_dev struct), we switched to a separate pinctrl_maps_mutex.
...but (oops) we forgot to re-think about the whole "locked" parameter
for pinctrl_register_map().  Basically the "locked" parameter appears
to still refer to whether the bigger pinctrl_dev mutex is locked, but
we're using it to skip locks of our (now separate) pinctrl_maps_mutex.

That's kind of a bad thing(TM).  Probably nobody noticed because most
of the calls to pinctrl_register_map happen at boot time and we've got
synchronous device probing.  ...and even cases where we're
asynchronous don't end up actually hitting the race too often.  ...but
after banging my head against the wall for a bug that reproduced 1 out
of 1000 reboots and lots of looking through kgdb, I finally noticed
this.

Anyway, we can now safely remove the "locked" parameter and go back to
a war-free, evil-free, and kernel-bug-free world.

Fixes: 42fed7ba44e4 ("pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to pinctrl_dev struct")
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c       |   10 ++++------
 drivers/pinctrl/core.h       |    2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ void devm_pinctrl_put(struct pinctrl *p)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_pinctrl_put);

 int pinctrl_register_map(struct pinctrl_map const *maps, unsigned num_maps,
-			 bool dup, bool locked)
+			 bool dup)
 {
 	int i, ret;
 	struct pinctrl_maps *maps_node;
@@ -1178,11 +1178,9 @@ int pinctrl_register_map(struct pinctrl_
 		maps_node->maps = maps;
 	}

-	if (!locked)
-		mutex_lock(&pinctrl_maps_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&pinctrl_maps_mutex);
 	list_add_tail(&maps_node->node, &pinctrl_maps);
-	if (!locked)
-		mutex_unlock(&pinctrl_maps_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&pinctrl_maps_mutex);

 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1197,7 +1195,7 @@ int pinctrl_register_map(struct pinctrl_
 int pinctrl_register_mappings(struct pinctrl_map const *maps,
 			      unsigned num_maps)
 {
-	return pinctrl_register_map(maps, num_maps, true, false);
+	return pinctrl_register_map(maps, num_maps, true);
 }

 void pinctrl_unregister_map(struct pinctrl_map const *map)
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.h
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline struct pin_desc *pin_desc_
 }

 int pinctrl_register_map(struct pinctrl_map const *maps, unsigned num_maps,
-			 bool dup, bool locked);
+			 bool dup);
 void pinctrl_unregister_map(struct pinctrl_map const *map);

 extern int pinctrl_force_sleep(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev);
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int dt_remember_or_free_map(struc
 	dt_map->num_maps = num_maps;
 	list_add_tail(&dt_map->node, &p->dt_maps);

-	return pinctrl_register_map(map, num_maps, false, true);
+	return pinctrl_register_map(map, num_maps, false);
 }

 struct pinctrl_dev *of_pinctrl_get(struct device_node *np)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/