[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55571756.2070909@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 11:09:26 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, pmeerw@...erw.net
CC: srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: ltr501: Fix proximity threshold boundary
check
On 16/05/15 00:42, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Currently, proximity sensor boundary check is done
> inside the switch block but outside the case
> statement.Since this code will never get executed,
> moved the check outside the switch case statement.
>
> 867 case IIO_PROXIMITY:
> 868 switch (dir) {
> // Following line has been moved outside the switch block.
> 869 if (val > LTR501_PS_THRESH_MASK)
> 870 return -EINVAL;
> 871 case IIO_EV_DIR_RISING:
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> index ca4bf47..417369b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> @@ -865,9 +865,9 @@ static int ltr501_write_thresh(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> case IIO_PROXIMITY:
> - switch (dir) {
> if (val > LTR501_PS_THRESH_MASK)
> return -EINVAL;
> + switch (dir) {
> case IIO_EV_DIR_RISING:
> mutex_lock(&data->lock_ps);
> ret = regmap_bulk_write(data->regmap,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists