[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150516015540.GP7232@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 02:55:40 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET v3] non-recursive pathname resolution & RCU
symlinks
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 06:47:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, maybe we could solve it with a new sleeping lock in the dentry
> itself. Maybe we could allocate the new dentry early, add it to the
> directory the usual way, but mark it as being "not ready" (so that
> d_lookup() wouldn't use it). And have the sleeping lock be a new
> sleeping lock in the dentry.
See upthread. It might be doable (provided that we turn ->i_mutex into
rwsem, to keep the exclusion with directory _modifiers_), but it'll need
a really non-trivial code review of a bunch of filesystems, especially ones
that want to play with the list of children like ceph does. And things
like sillyrename and dcache-populating readdir instances, albeit not as scary
as ceph. And then there's lustre...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists